The Role of High Technology in Maintaining Esthetic Restorations
Authored by Ronald E. Goldstein, DDS and Marilyn C. Miller DDS, FAGD 
 
Journal of Esthetic Dentistry Volume 8, Number 1

Two of the major goals of esthetics in restorative dentistry involve pleasing the patient and obtaining the longest possible life for esthetic restorations. It has become increasingly apparent that various areas of high technology have not only changed the way that we practice restorative dentistry, but also have a great deal to offer in helping obtain the goals ofesthetic dentistry. This article addresses the basic forms of high technology that provide dentists a greater opportunity to render more efficient and longer-lasting service to patients who wish to have the ultimate in esthetic dentistry. Preston recently said, "The computer offers a knowledge and communication resource that surpasses anything previously available. Its routine acceptance into the dental practice is inevitable." The problem is that it has taken too long for dentistry to incorporate the various aspects of computerized technology, with the result that patients are not receiving the quality of service that they otherwise might. Many esthetic failures can be prevented if various aspects of the technology mentioned in this article are used. It is, therefore, hoped that a review and suggested usage of various devices will enhance our ability to meet the goals of both esthetic and restorative dentistry.

INTRAORAL CAMERAS

To date, the intraoral camera is the clinical electronic device most widely accepted throughout dentistry. Intraoral cameras give patients a "tour" of their own mouths and a clearer understanding of any problems than can be achieved with radiographs, sketches, or casts. Although only about 25% of dental practices now have intraoral cameras, within the next few years that number should dramatically increase.

All intraoral cameras use a charged coupled device (CCD) chip to produce an image. Cameras may be either analog (producing a continuous video signal that may be viewed on any television monitor) or digital (with a computer-processed signal that produces an image that must be viewed on a computer monitor).

Cameras may have a fixed focus or may be manually adjusted. If the depth of field is great enough, the camera will accommodate to different focal lengths without adjustment and may be referred to as "self-focusing."

Most cameras offer a 180-degree lens that is considered universal. Although such lenses suffice for many anterior images and open mouth occlusal views, they are usually augmented by a 90-degree lens that allows close-up views of posterior teeth and palatal views. For maximum utility, a camera should be able to focus on a single tooth, as well as capture the entire arch.

Today, many camera systems provide a defogging air flow, whereas others rely on solutions for prewarming. Most cameras have a fiber optic light source that transmits light to the area being imaged; others rely on external sources, such as the dental light. Computer storage of images is also possible with some systems. A color film printer is a desirable accessory, since photographs can be produced for patients to take away as a reminder of what they must do to preserve their restorations.

Portability is another important consideration. Most camera systems are supplied with bulky carts; however, some are easily carried from room to room, providing greater flexibility of use. Still others offer the option of multioperatory integration, with only a camera and monitor in each operatory and all peripheral devices housed in a central location.
The primary use of the intraoral camera is diagnostic. A secondary but no less important purpose is as a communication aid to patients regarding the diagnosis.

The uses of intraoral cameras for prevention and maintenance in esthetic dentistry are four-fold:

  1. Following insertion of restorations, there is an advantage to being able to track any problems by periodic video examinations utilizing the intraoral camera. Visible and sometimes invisible potential marginal problems can be greatly enlarged. Certainly the ability to diagnose and treat a defective margin as early as possible can prolong both esthetic and functional life of restorations (Figure 1).

  2. Patients cannot see for themselves what we can see; thus, highly enlarged views made available by intraoral cameras enhance patient compliance in home care. Typically, patients wait until something is sensitive before seeking treatment. Periodic examinations utilizing the intraoral camera can play a significant role in prevention of inevitable esthetic failure due to marginal pathology.

    Intraoral cameras can and should also be used to show patients areas of their mouths that lack proper hygiene maintenance. For example, enlarged lingual views give patients the opportunity to see the inside of their mouths like never before. Most systems can show both intraoral and angular viewing of the posterior and occlusal as well as the lingual, and some have a separate camera for the front view (Figure 2).

    One of the most frequent causes of restoration failure is lack of gingival hygiene, with both flossing and brushing. When images of the mouth are magnified while the explorer is used to remove plaque from the sulcus, patients become visually aware of the importance of ongoing maintenance. Restoration longevity is normally expressed in averages. For instance, as noted in Change Your Smile, the restoration life expectancy for full crowns is 5 to 15 years. However, a patient should be aware that not even the normal range of life expectancywill be achieved unless these gingival areas are maintained on a daily basis.

  3. Intraoral cameras are also highly useful in showing patients existing microcracks. These microcracks can stain and cause other esthetic problems for patients. Photographs and permanent records of these microcracks can be of tremendous benefit to the patient in accident cases. Documentation of microcracks also provides a baseline for assessing subsequent staining or changes (Figures 3 and 4). It is easier and more dramatic to photograph microcracks with the intraoral camera than with standard 35 mm photography.

  4. The intraoral camera can be used to magnify and photograph areas of obvious bruxism. Wear facets can and should be photographed and shown to the patient with the patient duplicating the occlusal movements, especially in eccentric positions to demonstrate how the facet was produced (Figure 5 - to right). Most patients deny that they clench or grind their teeth. Rather than argue with patients, which produces a negative response, it is far more effective to show them exactly how the facets occurred. Although study casts can accomplish this, nothing compares to showing patients "up close," in their own mouths, exactly what is happening.

close windownext page